All simulations
Lump sum or a little each month
Invest all at once or spread it out? Replay every start date since 2005 and count which won.
Invest $12,000 inS&P 500
Spread it over
Judge the result after
Money not yet invested sits in a savings account.
Lump sum won74%104 of 141 start dates
Average lead of lump sum+2.8%
Worst start for lump sum-29.2%May 2008
Best start for lump sum+29.7%Feb 2009
Lump sum's lead over spreading it out, by start month
Tap a bar to replay that start date below.
Lump sum ended ahead Spreading it out ended ahead
Starting in Oct 2007, over 10 years
All at once$24,598
Over 12 months$28,140
How big the gap usually is
Each start month, lump sum's lead (right) or shortfall (left).
Putting $12,000 into S&P 500 all at once beat spreading it over 12 months in 74% of start dates, because markets that rise more often than they fall reward money that gets in early. But the losses are what people remember: when lump sum lost, it trailed by 8.6% on average, and by 29.2% starting in May 2008, against an average win of 6.8%. Spreading it out gives up some expected return to buy protection from regret.
Try this
- Tap the bars around late 2007. How far behind does a lump sum fall when it lands right before a crash?
- Switch to long Treasuries (TLT), then to Bitcoin. Does the winner change with the asset's volatility and trend?
- Raise the interest on waiting cash to 5%. How much of lump sum's edge does it take away?
The math
- the amount to invest
- number of monthly instalments
- monthly interest on cash still waiting
- price when instalment k is invested
- the lump sum, everything bought at the first price